Boost FileMaker UX: Advanced Uses of the Troi Dialog Plug-inImproving user experience (UX) in FileMaker applications often comes down to controlling how users interact with dialogs, confirmations, and input prompts. The Troi Dialog Plug-in extends FileMaker’s built-in dialog capabilities with flexible, programmable dialogs, custom buttons, styled text, images, and input validation. This article explores advanced techniques and practical patterns to elevate your FileMaker UX using the Troi Dialog Plug-in, with examples, implementation tips, and recommended workflows.
Why Troi Dialog Plug-in matters for UX
FileMaker’s native dialogs are useful but limited: fixed button layouts, modest styling, and limited control over user input and behavior. Troi Dialog introduces:
- Customizable dialogs (buttons, icons, text styles) to align with app branding and clarity.
- Non-blocking and modal options to manage user workflow flow.
- Input controls (text fields, checkboxes, radio buttons) with validation and default values.
- Scriptable behavior so dialogs can react to user choices and pass values back into FileMaker variables or fields.
These features let you design dialogs that communicate intent clearly, reduce user errors, and guide workflows—key components of strong UX.
Core features to leverage (advanced focus)
-
Custom buttons and dynamic button sets
- Create context-sensitive dialogs with buttons that change label, enabled state, or visibility depending on record data or script logic. This replaces multi-step confirmation dialogs with a single, clear choice point.
-
Styled text and HTML-like formatting
- Use bold, color, and font-size adjustments to emphasize critical information or warnings. Small visual cues in dialog copy reduce misclicks and speed comprehension.
-
Input controls with validation
- Build dialogs that collect quick user input (e.g., short notes, quantities, or email addresses) and validate before closing. Prevents invalid data from entering the system.
-
Icons and images for affordance
- Adding icons to dialogs (success, warning, help) gives immediate visual context and reduces the cognitive load of reading dense text.
-
Returning multiple values
- Capture multiple user choices/inputs from a single dialog and map them into FileMaker variables or fields in a single step.
Pattern: Streamlined confirmation with reason capture
Problem: Users confirm destructive actions (delete, irreversible changes) without providing a reason, leaving audit trails incomplete.
Solution: Use a Troi Dialog that combines a clear warning, reason input, and explicit choices.
Example flow:
- Show a dialog with a red warning icon, a bold one-line warning, a small paragraph describing consequences, a single-line input for “Reason”, and buttons: Cancel, Delete.
- Validate that the Reason field is not empty; if empty, show inline error and keep dialog open.
- On Delete, write the reason to the audit log together with user ID and timestamp.
UX benefits: forces accountability with minimal friction; reduces accidental confirmations by requiring explicit action.
Pattern: Contextual shortcuts and “smart defaults”
Problem: Repetitive dialogs force users to type the same values or make the same choices.
Solution: Populate dialog inputs with smart defaults based on context (last used value, user preferences, or record state). Provide a “Use last” checkbox that stores preferences in a user-specific table or local file.
Implementation tips:
- Read stored preference into a variable before calling Troi Dialog.
- Pre-fill the dialog input and offer a small “Remember my choice” checkbox (or a separate settings toggle).
- If the user checks “remember,” update the stored preference.
UX benefits: fewer keystrokes, personalized experience, and faster repetitive workflows.
Pattern: Multi-field quick edit modal
Problem: Editing multiple small fields across records requires opening full layouts or committing multiple steps.
Solution: Build a compact Troi Dialog that presents several fields (e.g., status, priority, short note) in one modal. Return values mapped to script variables and commit changes in a single script step.
Example layout inside dialog:
- Dropdown/radio for Status (Open / In Progress / Closed)
- Priority selector (High / Medium / Low)
- Short note input (single-line)
- Buttons: Cancel, Save
Implementation details:
- Use the plug-in’s ability to return multiple named results and map them to FileMaker variables with a single script step.
- Validate required fields before closing.
- Wrap changes in a transaction approach: set fields, commit, and log. On error, rollback logic can reset fields.
UX benefits: quick edits without navigating away from context; fewer clicks and faster bulk changes.
Pattern: Inline help and “Are you sure?” escalation
Problem: Novice users make mistakes because they don’t understand consequences.
Solution: Use progressive disclosure in dialogs:
- Initial dialog provides succinct instruction and a single primary action.
- If the user chooses the risky action, show a second confirmation dialog with more detailed explanation, example consequences, and a required checkbox “I understand” before enabling the final destructive button.
Implementation tips:
- Use different iconography and styling to escalate severity.
- Store whether the user has previously seen the escalation and optionally respect a “don’t show again” preference for experienced users.
UX benefits: balances safety for newcomers with speed for experienced users.
Pattern: Guided workflows with chained dialogs
Problem: Some multi-step tasks are linear but too clunky inside the main UI.
Solution: Chain multiple Troi Dialog calls to create a lightweight, guided wizard—each dialog collects a small piece of data and the script conditionally advances. Use progress labels and save intermediate results to variables.
Example: Creating a new project
- Dialog 1: Project name, template selection
- Dialog 2: Start date, owner assignment
- Dialog 3: Initial task count and auto-created tasks option
Implementation notes:
- Allow “Back” and “Cancel” buttons by constructing dialogs that return which button was pressed, and branch accordingly.
- Keep dialogs short; each should capture a single concept to avoid cognitive overload.
UX benefits: focused steps, lower error rates, and a pleasant sense of progress.
Pattern: Accessibility and keyboard-first dialogs
Problem: Dialogs that require mouse-only interactions hamper speed and accessibility.
Solution: Design dialogs with clear tab order, keyboard-activatable buttons (Enter to confirm, Esc to cancel), and proper focus on the first input. Troi Dialog supports keyboard navigation—verify your dialog scripting maps Enter/Escape behavior intentionally.
Implementation tips:
- Put the most common action on the left or where Enter will naturally trigger it, depending on your users’ mental models.
- For long forms, ensure label associations are clear for screen reader compatibility where possible.
UX benefits: faster power-user interaction and improved accessibility compliance.
Implementation specifics & sample script patterns
Below are concise examples of common implementation patterns. Adapt variable names and field references for your solution.
- Show a dialog with input and validate:
- Set variable with default: Set Variable [$default; Value: Get(Preference::LastNote)]
- Call Troi Dialog: pass prompt, default value, button labels
- On return, check result code; if OK, validate $resultValue ≠ “” and continue; otherwise loop or show inline error.
- Capture multiple fields:
- Call Troi Dialog to request multiple named values (e.g., status, priority, note)
- The plug-in returns a delimited result string or named pairs—parse into variables, then Set Field for each.
- Confirm & log:
- Call Troi Dialog (warning text + Delete/Cancel)
- If Delete chosen, Set Field [Audit::Action; “Deleted record”] and commit with timestamp and user ID.
Note: Exact script steps and function names depend on your Troi Dialog Plug-in version and your FileMaker scripting setup. Consult Troi’s function reference for parameter names, return formats, and examples.
Troubleshooting & performance tips
- Keep dialogs lightweight: avoid loading large images inline; use small icons or preloaded resources.
- Test on all target platforms (macOS, Windows) because fonts and default button behaviors can differ.
- For heavy workflows, prefer storing intermediate state in variables or a temporary table rather than relying on repeated dialogs to pass data through complex layouts.
- Use clear timeout behavior for unattended dialogs; set sensible defaults to avoid leaving processes hanging.
Measuring UX impact
To evaluate whether Troi Dialog improvements help:
- Track error rates before/after (e.g., accidental deletes).
- Measure task completion time for common workflows.
- Run brief user tests with 5–8 representative users focusing on dialogs—note confusion points and collect preference data about defaults and “don’t show again” options.
Recommended best practices checklist
- Use simple, direct language in dialog copy. Bold or highlight only the most critical words.
- Limit each dialog to one decision or small set of inputs.
- Provide clear cancel/escape paths.
- Use icons to reduce cognitive load.
- Persist useful defaults and preferences.
- Validate inputs client-side before committing changes.
By treating dialogs as design elements rather than throwaway system prompts, you can significantly improve clarity, reduce errors, and speed routine tasks in FileMaker. The Troi Dialog Plug-in gives you the control needed to build these thoughtful, context-aware interactions—apply the patterns above to make dialogs work for your users rather than against them.
Leave a Reply